Organic Foods Not More Nutritional · 19 August 2008, 11:50 by trickykid
There was or is an article on CNN.com about how new studies have claimed that organic foods are not more nutritional than conventional. Well, anyone with common sense should understand this. Conventional foods are just like organic foods, organic foods just lack all those tasty pesticides and chemicals to help them grow bigger and bug free.
So for them to breakdown the actual content of organic versus conventional, sure, all foods are the same to each other. But I’ve eaten both, sometimes there’s not any organic to choose from since it is more of a niche market but I’ll tell you one thing as a vegetable consuming animal, organic to me tastes better and like mentioned previously, it also lacks all those, cough cough, healthy pesticides and chemicals as well.
I’m curious as to who coined the phrase “organic food”. Maybe they should take a look at the dictionary to find out what the term “organic means”.
I suppose they know more about inorganic food.
Maybe there should be a better term to market the benefits of organic food.
• hari 20 August 2008, 08:53 #Yeah, I guess they call foods without the assistance of non natural pesticides and chemicals to make them grow bigger than natural, conventional as those without are truly organic. But really, both are organic when you break them down. I’m organic as well.. :)
• drew 20 August 2008, 23:34 #Commenting is closed for this article.